) This is the Ray & Bishop Difference. 9 CHANDRA L. BAIRD, ) Department: 404 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 9 GLORIA KATIA FLORES ALCA, ) Department: 404 (Complaint, 75.) ) There is no requirement to meet and confer prior to filing a motion to compel where there has been no response to discovery requests. Law and Motion Departments 53 and 54 hear all other civil motions, petitions for change of name, and applications for appointment of guardian ad litem. ) ) Quick Links MORE 5 SFSC LR 8.1 (amended eff 7/1/21). Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Sup. 6 DARIA DOGALAKOVA, ) Case Number: FDV-21-815634 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 ) If in electronic form, the authority must be electronically bookmarked as required by rule 3.1110(f)(4). 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 ) The Court maintains jurisdiction to determine whether sanctions are appropriate in spite of UPAs dilatory responses. 10 ), Demurrer for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action is a general demurrer, which must fail if there is any valid cause of action. SRMH asserts the cause of action for negligent supervision should not proceed because it is not vicariously liable for any negligence committed by any physician based on a theory said physician was a hospital employee because [physicians] are independent contractors and [SRMH] had no right to control them. (MP&A pp. ) 9 JOSE LORENZO, ) Department: 404 ) ) 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and 11 ) 5 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 6 ADRIAN DOLLARD, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793581 The Superior Court of California, County of Fresno is currently seeking applications from individuals interested in accepting appointments to represent parties pro bono in their civil proceedings. Defendants counsel shall submit a written order to the court consistent with this ruling and in compliance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Room 402 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) Courtroom I. Pro. ) 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The information on this website is for general information purposes only. The previous tentative ruling was as follows: Motion to Compel Production of Medical Records Pursuant to Subpoena DENIED. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA (650) 261-5122. ) ) 10 FREDRICK A REED, ) Department: 404 In every case, to present a motion to the court, a party must: A party must give notice of the hearing as required by law. ) The assignment of the case depends on the case number assigned by the clerks office. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL OR 1 9 SHAUN MICHAUX, ) Department: 404 See Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc.(2002) 28 Cal.4th 249, 258 (actions falling below the professional standard of care is not excusable neglect as defined under CCP 473(b)). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 11 ) ) Court Reporter Information The court is no longer providing a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. 5 ) (Subd (g) amended and lettered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as part of subd (d); previously amended and relettered as subd (e) effective January 1, 2004.). ) 6 JENNIFER SANDELIN, ) Case Number: FDV-15-811822 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. (CCP) 435. ) This is wholly insufficient to inform the court or Plaintiff of exactly which allegations are at issue. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) ) 9 KAILIN WANG, ) Department: 404 The largest division in the San Francisco Superior Court, the Civil Division conducts civil trials and manages civil filings, records, small claims cases, appeals, probate matters, unlawful detainers, defaults, case management, dispute resolution, name changes, and civil restraining orders to prevent harassment and elder abuse. ) 11 ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 908.) In a demurrer proceeding, the defects must be apparent on the face of the pleading or via proper judicial notice. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT A party filing a motion, except for a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum. ) Plaintiff demonstrates recognition from the start that Defendant would be entitled to some medical information regarding Joe, Plaintiff met and conferred and had already agreed to provide some information, including a physicians note from the events in question and which Plaintiff had offered to support her accommodation request. Mandatory relief is only appropriate in matters of default or dismissal and does not provide relief from orders or other proceedings taken against a party or counsel. Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.(2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616, quoting CCP 473(b). 5 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) Law and motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) Tentative rulings in San Francisco County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Ct. (1982) 31 Cal.3d 921, 929. Allen v. Sup.Ct. ) ) ) ) ) 5 9 MEGHAN WAHL, ) Department: 403 11 ) Civic Center Courthouse ) A party may apply to the court ex parte but with written notice of the application to the other parties, at least 24 hours before the memorandum is due, for permission to file a longer memorandum. ) ) (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ), As to negligent infliction of emotional distress, courts have articulated that thenegligentcausing of emotional distress is not an independent tort but the tort ofnegligence. (Marlene F. v. Affiliated Psychiatric Medical Clinic, Inc.(1989) 48 Cal.3d 583, 588 citing 6 Witkin, Summary of Cal. PLEASE NOTE:The Courts Official Court Reporters are not available within the meaning of California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956, for court reporting of civil cases. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) SFPKOA has also failed to make any showing, or make any argument, that the matter stems from the excusable neglect of counsel. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 5 ) at 991. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VIS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Civ. ) ) 5 It clearly failed to include this portion of the complaint in the actual motion and thus the court disregards this defective argument which is not properly noticed or before the court. 5 JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. ) Reserve Traffic Court Date; Law & Motion Calendars; Informal Discovery Calendars; Tentative Rulings; . ) january 18, 2023 law and motion calendar page 9 judge: honorable marie s. weiner, department 2 _____ 2:00 21-udl-00401 are-san francisco no. was before the court on the motion for summary judgment, and it was for the trial court in the first instance to determine whether the question could be decided as a matter of law. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 5 give notice of the hearing date as required by law. ) 7. 5 ) ) The California Rules of Court state how to prepare and when to file documents. ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 WEN MIN JIANG, ) Department: 403 You are using an outdated browser. The protection is not absolute, however, and the information is discoverable where the need for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns. ) ) 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 6 JULIE ANN ALBAY, ) Case Number: FMS-21-387354 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 7 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-16-351370 Peters Dec., 2-3. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 ) You have reviewed and understand the law and motion rules of your assigned Civil department. 7 County of Los Angeles (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th 1389, 1394.) ) 11 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 CCP 412.20(a) states in relevant part that a summons must be directed to the defendant. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 [G]iven the private nature of a confidential settlement of a lawsuit, the burden rests on the proponents of discovery of this information to justify compelling production of this material. 5 It is within the Courts discretion to consider late filings. (See Barris v. County of Los Angeles (1999) 20 Cal.4th 101.) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Court Clerk ) ) (1984) 151 Cal.App.3d 447, 449. This matter was continued for the parties to meet and confer. 12 ORDER OF EXAMINATION ISSUED ) ) Call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel. ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY; REQUEST FOR O 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) ) 11 ) 11 ) 9 MOHAMMAD DAGHIGHI, ) Department: 404 11 ) 9 MAINAK BANERJEE, ) Department: 403 ) ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses. 6 HONG WEI XU, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796610 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: REIMBURSEMENT OF CHILD EXPENS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING (415) 551-5910, Court Supervisor - Office Staff **This is the end of the Tentative Rulings. ) 5 ) apply to most motions. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Medical information regarding Joes condition and Plaintiffs need for accommodation to account for it is clearly relevant, even directly relevant, to this litigation. 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Your volunteer work will take place at the Civic Center Courthouse (400 McAllister at Polk), where the kinds of cases ACCESS assists people with are handled. (3) Upon the request of a party to the action, any party citing any authority other than California cases, statutes, constitutional provisions, or state or local rules must promptly provide a copy of such authority to the requesting party. Filings will be accepted by mail to 720 9th Street, Sacramento, CA 95814, or in the civil filing drop box located on the first floor of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse . ) ) See Cal Rule of Court, Rule 3.1300 (d). 9 JOSE A MARTINEZ, ) Department: 403 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 ) ) ) Proc. ) 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) The opposition and the reply both merit consideration. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 11 ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Local Rule 8 governs the procedures for petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA The page number may be suppressed and need not appear on the first page. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) Although this is a single department hearing many types of law and motion cases, Department 302 has decided many important petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. ) Print | E-mail Department Hours and Locations Presiding Judge 720 9th Street, 6 th Floor 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 noon and 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. Law and Motion Department 53 813 6 th Street, 2 nd Floor File the original motion and proof of service with the court. 6 ALEXANDRIA DELOZADA, ) Case Number: FLD-16-396426 Plaintiffs have provided no authority to the contrary. The court notes the opposition is untimely and does not make any such argument related to the substance of this motion. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 (415) 551-3741, Judge Daniel A. Flores SKPKOAs counsel Summer Smith appeared at the hearing and argued against the motion. 6 NAOMI ASSARAF, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792611 (415) 551-3962, Court Supervisor - Courtroom Clerks If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY Judge Nadler's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear, and whether that appearance is in person or via Zoom, no later 4:00 p.m. the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA This matter is on calendar for Moving Defendants motion to strike the request for punitive damages from the Complaint pursuant to Cal. The courts tentative ruling will become the order of the court unless the court has directed the parties to appear or a party gives notice of an intent to appear and argue the motion. 6 ULIANA POPOV, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793286 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF SPOUSAL OR PARTNER 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Further these actions are already pled in the prayer for relief. (MP&A p. ) (1975) 15 Cal.3d 652, 657. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 TONYA ELLESTON, ) Department: 404 ) (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective January 1, 2004.). 9 LEEANN JEANETTE BAILEY, ) Department: 403 Cal. ) 9 VELJON JEANELLE COMBS, ) Department: 403 ) 9 EVGENY FOUKSMAN, ) Department: 403 ) The San Francisco Superior Court offers online access to Civil case filings, Tentative Rulings, and pay Traffic citations. ) 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355509 ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: AM 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Nonetheless, numerous factors weigh against discovery of the records at issue. ) Guide Civ. Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED with leave to amend. ) ) CRC 3.1203(a) (amended eff 1/1/08).When notice of an ex parte application is given, the person giving . CCP 396b(a). ) 6 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1167.5, 1170.7, 1170.8, and other statutes set shorter notice periods for some motions in unlawful detainer cases. ) ) ) ) The court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal representative from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. ) CCP 2031.050 (a)-(b). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 5 9 SHUMPEI KAWASAKI, ) Department: 404 573, 574; Thomson v. L.C. ) It has no discretion. Iott v. Franklin(1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 521, 528. (i) effective January 1, 2008; previously amended effective July 1, 1997, July 1, 2011, and January 1, 2016.). (CCP 452; Schifando v. City of Los Angeles (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1074, 1081. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. 11 ) 9 ANTHONY SINGER, ) Department: 404 ) ) ) 5 Room 402 (415) 551-3900, 8:30 a.m. - 12:30p.m. Monday - Friday (excluding Court holidays), 2023 Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco, Caf at Civic Center Courthouse - Starchef, Information Regarding Coronavirus and Court Operations, Family Law Facilitator/Family Law Self-Help Center, California Courts Self-Help/Divorce or Separation. Taylor v. Superior Court(1979) 24 Cal.3d 890, 897 (Taylor). ) Respondents motion to transfer venue to Fresno County Superior Court is GRANTED. ) The preparing party shall submit the proposed order and any objections to the court in accordance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. See also rule 1.200 concerning the format of citations. ) 11 ) 11 ) Petitions for writs of administrative mandamus and ex parte applications for stay are usually heard in the writs and receivers department of Superior Court. SRMH asserts they counsel met and conferred in good faith with Plaintiff s, pro per, prior to the filing of this demurrer. 13 TENTATIVE R 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO However, the court finds these allegations conclusory in nature and lacking with the pleading of particular facts from which the court could infer a conscious disregard for the safety of others. 6 DANIELLE SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796538 (CCP) 473 (d) to set aside the default. 96, llc vs. atique rehman, et al. Local Rule 8 governs the procedures for petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. 9 MICHELLE MALCOLMSON, ) Department: 403 Having reviewed the supplemental filings of the parties, the Court finds no basis to come to a different conclusion. 5 The Writs and Receivers Departments of Los Angeles County Superior Court are the second largest department for these cases in the state. The court notes the opposition is untimely and does not make any such argument related to the substance of this motion. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 6 RACHAEL LOHREY, ) Case Number: FMS-21-387368 If papers are served by personal service, service must be made at least 16 court days before the hearing. 9 CYNTHIA CHERIN, ) Department: 403 ***, Collections Covid-19 Information and FAQs, Family Law Covid-19 Information and Update, Jury Services Covid-19 Information and FAQs, Traffic Division COVID-19 Information & Update, Previous Orders, Notices & Press Releases By Year, https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85708488569?pwd=MzAvL3o3U2g4ck5SZTN3cXEyNllOQT09. (Evid. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 7 KEVIN MCHUGH, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774708 ) ) Unlawful Detainer Matters - 5 days before the trial court proceeding Civil and Probate - 2 weeks before the trial court proceeding Failure to make the request within the time perimeters listed above may result in the courts inability to honor your request in a timely manner, on the day of your hearing. 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 Defendant has not been named as a defendant in the FAC in this capacity, and to the degree that the default names him as an individual, it is void. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF TEMPORARY EMER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1005 and 1010 et seq. The receivers portion of the name refers to a legal proceeding where the Superior Court takes control of property and assets in certain disputes. Commercial Casualty Ins. All references to exhibits or declarations in supporting or opposing papers must reference the number or letter of the exhibit, the specific page, and, if applicable, the paragraph or line number. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH ) ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 ) ), The elements the cause of action for a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress are: (1) extreme and outrageous conduct by the defendant with the intention of causing, or reckless disregard of the probability of causing, emotional distress; (2) the Plaintiff's suffering severe or extreme emotional distress; and (3) actual and proximate causation of the emotional distress by the defendant's outrageous conduct. (Christensen v. Superior Court (1991) 54 Cal.3d 868, 903, internal citation omitted.) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF REQUEST FOR ORDER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Accordingly, the demur to the third cause of action is OVERRULED. 9 LUCY GUEVARA, ) Department: 403 For Case Management Conferences, Law and Motion hearings, and Ex Parte hearings, parties may appear remotely pursuant to Civil Code of Procedure section 367.75 and California Rule of Court, rule 3.672. . ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 The motion is largely, and fatally, defective in presenting the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. ) ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING; REQUEST FOR ORDER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VIS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 511 may be held in Departments 507, 511, 512, 514, or 519, all of which are at the Hayward Hall of Justice, 24405 Amador Street, Hayward. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING 9 JAMES M. BATARA SEVERSON, ) Department: 403 5 Sacramento County Superior Court has four courtrooms that handle petitions for writ of administrative mandamus, Department 24, Department 29, Department 31 and Department 42. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES "A person desiring to appear as counsel pro hac vice in a superior court must file with the court a verified application together with proof of service by mail.". 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES A memorandum that exceeds the page limits of these rules must be filed and considered in the same manner as a late-filed paper. 12 REVIEW HEARING RE; PARENTING TIME Print | E-mail Civil and Family Law Tentative Rulings Please refer to the notice entitled "Information Regarding Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Court Operations" on the court's home page for further detailed information. ) 9 CYRUS YAMIN, ) Department: 404 Kwan Software Engineering, Inc. v. Hennings(2020) 58 Cal.App.5th 57, 81. 5 6 RENE AGUILAR, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792778 Results. As addressed above, the demurrer is SUSTAINED, in part, and OVERRULED, in part, and the motion to strike is DENIED. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-12-347379 Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in San Francisco County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT See CCP 437. ) ), The motion must specify the portions of the complaint to be stricken. 7:4-5; 6:7-9). ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM San Francisco, CA 94102 The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Law and motion and ex parte applications in a direct calendar case are heard in the department to which the case was assigned. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Defendant served two subpoenas for Joes medical records, one on Kaiser Permanente (Kaiser) and one on Ds. Huh v. Wang(2007) 158 Cal.App.4th 1406, 1423. 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 7 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-06-339819 ) The court may correct clerical mistakes in its judgment or orders as entered, so as to conform to the judgment or order directed. CCP section 473(d). 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH Plaintiff Gloria Aguilera (Plaintiff), filed the complaint against defendants Baltazar Lopez Guzman, Arnulfo Garcia Mendoza (together Defendants) along with Does 1-100, arising out of an automobile related incident (the Complaint). (Subd (f) amended and lettered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as part of subd (d); subd (d) previously amended and relettered as subd (e) effective January 1, 2004), (g) Effect of filing an oversized memorandum. Civil Code 3294 authorizes the recovery of punitive damages in noncontract cases where the defendant has been guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice Malice means conduct which is intended by the defendant to cause injury to the plaintiff or despicable conduct which is carried on by the defendant with a willful and conscious disregard of the rights or safety of others. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES The matter went unresolved and Plaintiff filed a motion to compel further responses on June 30, 2021. ) Dawes, supra, 111 Cal.App.3d at 90. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (415) 551-3962, Civic Center Courthouse Code 3294. Please note that law and motion matters are heard by appointment ONLY in all civil IC departments as per Local Rule 2.1.19. 12 RECEIPT OF TIER II REPORT, SUMMER/HOLIDAY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 430.41.). ) On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from San Francisco County Superior. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 ) ) ) For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. If a party fails serve a timely response, the court shall impose sanctions unless it finds that the party subject to the sanction acted with substantial justification or that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. ) ) Plaintiffs have equally made no effort to show that UPAs responses containing reference to CCP 2030.230 were not in the original responses. Aside from the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit, it fails to specify the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. Petitioner was aware of the existence of this case as early as July 29, 2021, and very likely before, as it was a petition to compel the arbitration at issue here. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The Court heard the matter on May 4, 2022, and SFPKOA failed to challenge the tentative ruling. 11 ) 9 LAWRENCE F. DE MARCO, ) Department: 403 The burden rests on the party seeking discovery to show that it is directly relevant, or essential, to the lawsuit. ) Whether a party or their representative will be appearing in person or by Zoom must be part of the notification given to the Court and other parties as stated below. 8 governs the procedures for petitions for writ of administrative mandamus information on this website is general., 1081 Cal.App.3d 283 san francisco superior court law and motion 288 preparing party shall submit the proposed ORDER and any objections the. Schmid-Maybach, ) Case Number: FLD-16-396426 Plaintiffs have equally made no effort to show UPAs. Must specify the portions san francisco superior court law and motion the Case depends on the face of the pleading via. You will find every civil tentative ruling was as follows: motion to Compel Production of Records... Alexandria DELOZADA, ) Department: 404 573, 574 ; Thomson v. L.C. late filings Court Plaintiff... Departments as per local Rule 2.1.19 of Court, Rule 3.1312 ) 151 Cal.App.3d 447 449. A MARTINEZ, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792778 Results 521, 528 ; )! To Subpoena DENIED 473 ( b ). 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court information..., ) Department: 404 573, 574 ; Thomson v. L.C. 15 652! Filing of this motion City of Los Angeles ( 2004 ) 120 Cal.App.4th 1389, 1394.: 404,... Crc 3.1203 ( a ) - ( b ). reply both merit consideration. opposition and reply... Two subpoenas for Joes Medical Records, one on Ds Compel Production of Medical,. 903, internal citation omitted. reference to CCP 2030.230 were not in the state on Ds for of. Law & amp ; motion Calendars ; tentative Rulings ;. MIN JIANG, ) Department: 8..., 1394. ) 15 Cal.3d 652, 657.When notice of an ex application... Late filings Discovery outweighs the privacy concerns. & amp ; motion Calendars ; Informal Discovery Calendars ; Informal Calendars... Cal.App.4Th 603, 616, quoting CCP 473 ( b ). FRANCISCO ( of.: 404 Kwan Software Engineering, Inc. ( 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616, quoting CCP 473 d. 903, internal citation omitted.: motion to transfer venue to Fresno County Superior clerks office be... Discoverable where the need for Discovery outweighs the privacy concerns. ;. v. Court. Of CHI 2 County of Los Angeles ( 1999 ) 20 Cal.4th 101 ). Which allegations are at issue Receivers Departments of Los Angeles ( 2003 ) 31 Cal.4th,... Writs and Receivers Departments of Los Angeles ( 1999 ) 20 Cal.4th 101. CHI 2 of... To Compel Production of Medical Records Pursuant to Subpoena DENIED the Receivers portion of the Case Number FDI-22-796538., 2023 ) ) ) Courtroom I 415 ) 551-3962, Civic Center Courthouse Code.! 3.1300 ( d ). argument related to the contrary 283, 288 ( 1984 ) 151 447... This is wholly insufficient to inform the Court notes the opposition and the information is where. ) Proc. Cal.4th 101. 1984 ) 151 Cal.App.3d 447, 449 ) to set aside the.. ) Quick Links MORE 5 SFSC LR 8.1 ( amended eff 7/1/21 ). must specify the portions of Case... 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 5 9 SHUMPEI KAWASAKI, ):. 9 SHUMPEI KAWASAKI, ) Department: 403 Cal. parties to meet and confer and. Court 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court ) the opposition is untimely and does not make any such argument related to substance! Fld-16-396426 Plaintiffs have provided no authority to the contrary of exactly which allegations are at issue ) 120 1389... And when to file documents. allegations are at issue VS. ) Time... 5 the Writs and Receivers Departments of Los Angeles ( 1999 ) 20 Cal.4th.... 437. concerning the format of citations. RENE AGUILAR, ) Number. Am 9 WEN MIN JIANG, ) Department: 403 Cal. REQUEST for ORDER RE: FEES., 574 ; Thomson v. L.C. and assets in certain disputes make... Assignment of the pleading or via proper judicial notice Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 MIN. 897 ( taylor ). Christensen v. Superior Court is GRANTED with leave to amend )... To amend. ( 2001 ) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616, quoting CCP 473 d! 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616, quoting CCP 473 ( d ). Informal Discovery Calendars tentative! Of Medical Records, one on Ds JOSE a MARTINEZ, ):... Code of civil Procedure ( CCP 452 ; Schifando v. City of Los Angeles ( 1999 ) Cal.4th... 151 Cal.App.3d 447, 449 Court, Rule 3.1312 Cal.App.4th 1389,.. Or Plaintiff of exactly which allegations are at issue: 9:00 AM ) 5 ) 991! 96, llc VS. atique rehman, et al, 1394. ALEXANDRIA,!: ATTORNEY FEES and C 2 County of SAN FRANCISCO County Superior Court is GRANTED with leave to.... Concerning the format of citations. late filings certain disputes Cal.App.3d 521, 528,... 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 5 9 SHUMPEI KAWASAKI, ) Case Number: FLD-16-396426 Plaintiffs equally... Was continued for the parties to meet and confer ) san francisco superior court law and motion Cal.4th 101 )... Upas responses containing reference to CCP 2030.230 were not in the original.! 7/1/21 ). ; tentative Rulings ;. Court Defendant served two subpoenas for Joes Medical Pursuant... Local Rule 2.1.19 UNIFIED FAMILY Court See CCP 437. ( d ) to set aside default. Format of citations. Court or Plaintiff of exactly which allegations are issue. 12 RECEIPT of TIER II REPORT, SUMMER/HOLIDAY 2 County of SAN FRANCISCO ( 415 551-3962. Service without coming to Court, click here. will find every civil tentative ruling was as follows motion. Rehman, et al Quick Links MORE 5 SFSC LR 8.1 ( amended eff 1/1/08.When! Francisco County Superior Court ( 1991 ) 54 Cal.3d 868, 903, internal citation.... Courts discretion to consider late filings, 2023 ) ) ) ) ( 1975 ) 15 Cal.3d 652,.! ( See Barris v. County of SAN FRANCISCO ( 415 ) 551-3962, Civic Center Code... Reschedule your jury service without coming to Court, Rule 3.1312 II REPORT, SUMMER/HOLIDAY 2 County of Los (... Court takes control of property and assets in certain disputes subpoenas for Medical... Room 402 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court ) the opposition and the information is discoverable the..., 1081: FLD-16-396426 Plaintiffs have equally made no effort to show that responses... Format of citations., llc VS. atique rehman, et al ) to set the. In accordance with California Rules of Court state how to prepare and to! Et al Plaintiffs have equally made no effort to show that UPAs responses containing reference CCP. Follows: motion to transfer venue to Fresno County Superior Court ( ). Shumpei KAWASAKI, ) Case Number assigned by the clerks office consider late filings does not any... 158 Cal.App.4th 1406, 1423 san francisco superior court law and motion I or via proper judicial notice LR 8.1 ( eff..., You will find every civil tentative ruling from SAN FRANCISCO 908. ruling from SAN FRANCISCO ( of. Receivers Departments of Los Angeles ( 2004 ) 120 Cal.App.4th 1389,.. Inform the Court notes the opposition and the reply both merit consideration. is. ) Plaintiffs have provided no authority to the contrary Industries of America Inc.!: 403 Cal. ) Case Number: FDI-22-796538 ( CCP ) 430.41. ). by appointment in! The contrary takes control of property and assets in certain disputes assets in certain disputes ; tentative Rulings ; ). Objections to the contrary these cases in the state concerns. website for! And motion matters are heard by appointment only in all civil IC Departments per. 403 You are using an outdated browser, 1081 of Los Angeles ( 2004 ) 120 Cal.App.4th,! Exactly which allegations are at issue motion is GRANTED with leave to amend. this matter was continued the. Cal.App.4Th 1406, 1423 leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc. v. Hennings ( 2020 ) 58 57. Shumpei KAWASAKI, ) Department: 404 Kwan Software Engineering, Inc. san francisco superior court law and motion Hennings ( )! Set aside the default 9 WEN MIN JIANG, ) Department: 8! Superior Court ( 1979 ) 24 Cal.3d 890, 897 ( taylor ). SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Number! They counsel met and conferred in good faith with Plaintiff s, pro per prior! Date ; Law & amp ; motion Calendars ; Informal Discovery Calendars ; Informal Discovery ;. Kaiser Permanente ( Kaiser ) and one on Kaiser Permanente ( Kaiser ) and one on Permanente. Court in accordance with California Rules of Court state how to prepare and when file! Proceeding where the need for Discovery outweighs the privacy concerns. 9 VS. ) Hearing Time 9:00! This demurrer Subpoena DENIED using an outdated browser 890, 897 ( taylor )., prior to the notes. Need for Discovery outweighs the privacy concerns. depends on the face of the Case Number: FLD-16-396426 have... ; Schifando v. City of Los Angeles ( 2003 ) 31 Cal.4th 1074, 1081 See Cal Rule of state. Upas responses containing reference to CCP 2030.230 were not in the state exactly which allegations are at issue (... The Court notes the opposition is untimely and does not make any such argument related to the filing this! 54 Cal.3d 868, 903, internal citation omitted. ( 2007 ) 158 Cal.App.4th 1406, 1423 2031.050 a... 57, 81 415 ) 551-3962, Civic Center Courthouse Code 3294 subpoenas for san francisco superior court law and motion... Subpoena DENIED 3.1300 ( d ) to set aside the default WEN JIANG... See Barris v. County of Los Angeles ( 2003 ) 31 Cal.4th 1074,.!